首页> 外文OA文献 >Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share (Tps) dengan Guided Note Taking (Gnt) pada Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Bekerja Sama Siswa Kelas VIII Smp/mts Negeri di Kota Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014
【2h】

Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share (Tps) dengan Guided Note Taking (Gnt) pada Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Bekerja Sama Siswa Kelas VIII Smp/mts Negeri di Kota Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014

机译:从2013/2014学年在Surakarta学年的VIII级初中/ MTs学生的协作能力出发,对直线方程式材料中的引导对笔记(Gnt)进行思维对共享(Tps)学习模型的实验

摘要

The objectives of this research were to investigate: (1) which of the TPS-GNT learning model, the TPS learning model, and the direct learning model results in a better mathematics learning achievement; (2) which of the students with high, mediun, and low team work have a better mathematics learning achievement; and (3) which of team work of the students result in a better learning achievement for each learning models; and (4) which of the TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning models result in a better learning achievement for each level of team work of the students.This research used the quasi-experimental method. The population of this research was all students of the junior secondary schools in Surakarta in the academic year of 2013/2014. The samples of this research consisted of 288 students who were divided into three experiment groups. The three groups consisted of group 1, group 2, and group 3. Both of group 1 and group 2 consisted of 193 students whereas group 3 consisted of 95 students. The data of this research were gathered from test of learning achievement in mathematics, questionnaire, and documentation. The data were then analyzed by using umbalanced Two-way Analysis of Variance. According to the research results, it can be concluded: (1) the learning model of Modified TPS was better than that of the TPS and direct learning models while the learning model of TPS was better than the direct learning model; (2) the students with high team work had a better learning achievement than those with medium and low team work while the students with medium team work was better than the low team work; and (3) in each team work, student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work, the mathematics learning achievement of the students taught with TPS-GNT learning model, TPS learning model, and direct learning model was as good as that of those; (4) in each learning model, the TPS-GNT, TPS and direct learning models, the learning achievement of the student with high team work, medium team work, and low team work, was as good as that of those.
机译:这项研究的目的是调查:(1)TPS-GNT学习模型,TPS学习模型和直接学习模型中的哪一个产生了更好的数学学习成绩; (2)哪些具有较高,中等和较低团队合作精神的学生具有较好的数学学习成绩; (3)学生的哪些团队合作可为每种学习模式带来更好的学习成绩; (4)TPS-GNT,TPS和直接学习模式中的哪一种在学生团队合作的各个层次上都能获得更好的学习成绩。本研究采用准实验方法。这项研究的对象是2013/2014学年泗水初中的所有学生。这项研究的样本包括288名学生,他们被分为三个实验组。这三个小组分别由小组1,小组2和小组3组成。小组1和小组2均由193名学生组成,而小组3由95名学生组成。这项研究的数据来自数学,问卷调查和文档学习成绩测试。然后使用不平衡的双向方差分析法对数据进行分析。根据研究结果可以得出以下结论:(1)改进型TPS的学习模型优于TPS和直接学习模型,而TPS的学习模型优于直接学习模型; (2)团队合作能力强的学生比中,低团队合作能力的学生学习成绩更好,而团队合作能力中等的学生要优于低团队合作能力的学生; (3)在团队合作,团队合作高,中团队合作,低团队合作的学生中,采用TPS-GNT学习模型,TPS学习模型和直接学习模型教授的学生的数学学习成绩均良好像那些(4)在每个学习模型中,TPS-GNT,TPS和直接学习模型中,具有较高团队合作,中等团队合作和较低团队合作的学生的学习成绩均与上述情况相同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号